Download Big Picture Bioethics: Developing Democratic Policy in by Susan Dodds, Rachel A. Ankeny PDF

By Susan Dodds, Rachel A. Ankeny

This booklet addresses the matter of ways to make democratically-legitimate public coverage on problems with contentious bioethical debate. It makes a speciality of moral contests approximately learn and their valid solution, whereas addressing questions of political legitimacy. How should still states make public coverage on matters the place there's moral confrontation, not just approximately acceptable results, yet even what values are at stake? What constitutes justified, democratic coverage in such conflicted domain names? Case stories from Canada and Australia reveal that international locations sharing ancient and institutional features can succeed in various coverage responses.

This publication is of curiosity to policymakers, bioethicists, and philosophers, and may deepen our realizing of the interactions among large-scale socio-political forces and precise coverage difficulties in bioethics.
asdf

Show description

Read or Download Big Picture Bioethics: Developing Democratic Policy in Contested Domains PDF

Similar international_1 books

Knowledge and Systems Engineering: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference KSE 2014

This quantity includes papers offered on the 6th foreign convention on wisdom and structures Engineering (KSE 2014), which was once held in Hanoi, Vietnam, in the course of 9–11 October, 2014. The convention used to be geared up through the college of Engineering and know-how, Vietnam nationwide college, Hanoi. in addition to the most music of contributed papers, this court cases function the result of 4 specific classes targeting particular subject matters of curiosity and 3 invited keynote speeches.

Topics in Nonparametric Statistics: Proceedings of the First Conference of the International Society for Nonparametric Statistics

This quantity consists of peer-reviewed papers that experience built from the 1st convention of the overseas Society for Non Parametric records (ISNPS). This inaugural convention came about in Chalkidiki, Greece, June 15-19, 2012. It was once geared up with the co-sponsorship of the IMS, the ISI and different agencies.

Additional info for Big Picture Bioethics: Developing Democratic Policy in Contested Domains

Example text

2007. Final report: Review of possible impacts of nanotechnology on Australia’s regulatory frameworks. Melbourne: Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies, Monash University. Macedo, S. 1991. Liberal virtues: Citizenship, virtue and community in liberal constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon. , and D. King. 1999. Citizens and rationing: Analysis of a European survey. Health Policy 49: 75–135. M. 1999. Public involvement in health care priority setting: An overview of methods for eliciting values. Health Expectations 2: 222–234.

2002. Postcolonial liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jasanoff, S. 1997. Civilisation and madness: The great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science 6: 221–232. , and J. ). 1995. Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum. Larmore, C. 1990. Political liberalism. Political Theory 18: 339–360. , M. N. Fortin. 1998. An overview of public consultation mechanisms developed to address the ethical and social issues raised by biotechnology.

In short, pragmatic approaches endorse the maxim that “we clarify a hypothesis by identifying its practical consequences” (Hookway 2008). Where policy matters are the subject of inquiry, the identification of practical consequences of hypothetical responses occurs through discussion, consultation, persuasion and debate. Dewey importantly viewed democracy as a form of social inquiry: problem solving through public deliberation (Festenstein 2005). John Gastil sees Dewey’s understanding of full deliberation as involving “a careful examination of a problem or issue, the identification of possible solutions, the establishment or reaffirmation of evaluative criteria, and the use of these criteria identifying an optimal solution” (2000, 22).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.59 of 5 – based on 30 votes